Linear

“I gave up on automating things through linear other than using the MCP to do linear esque things (create, read, update , etc)”

“just use codex with cyrus in linear instead”

“I'm trying to use the codex plugin with Linear so that I can assign issues to it and have it open tasks in Codex in the respective repo for the given project, but it's totally messed up. It always opens up a new task inside the wrong repo, and it seems stuck in one particular repo every time.”

“@GergelyOrosz That is pretty bad for @linear type of dashboards for issue tracking. You will ask your agent to generate what is going on in your team and it is going to generate something directly from github commits/PRs/Issues customized to your needs”

“@wongmjane @cognition @devindesktop Every 3 months I flip flop between "Linear will crush it in the AI era" and "Linear will be crushed in the AI era".”

“Cognition is working on “Boards” in Devin, a Linear-like project management tool”

“I use linear. Which is an issue tracker designed to work with AI through mcp. Break big things into a project with issues and update your skills/commands so that you’re always pulling/updating linear issues.”

“Except when a new product shows how it can be done. Eg Bun for building, Linear for issues, Craft Docs for editing… and look at this Superlogical demo for tmux:”

“>Linear Documents have built-in version history (every edit, even AI/MCP edits, is diffable/revertable). That's your "living artifact." Use Comments for the "why" thread.”

“I feel like Linear might be an easier tool for my non-technical product managers, but it feels a little too stateless. It doesn't seem to be doing a good job of keeping track of changes.”

“and honestly the second person is the real threshold, not agent count: as soon as another human is involved the plan moves out of the repo into linear/issues so humans own the queue and agents just get scoped tickets.”

“Everything I build assumes there’s a written plan somewhere (a tasks file, Linear, GitHub issues) that agents pull work from. But I keep hearing from people whose real process is closer to “I tell each agent what to do in its own terminal and hold the rest in my head.””

“We tested Notion and Linear early on. Both worked fine as tools but the tool matters less than the protocol. My agents wrote to a shared task file with a strict format and I reviewed it daily.”

“I miss Linear. Best issue tracker I used hands down.”

“Linear is not bad, but feels a little to complex at times, also has limited issues on the free tier, but the basic plan looks like a good option. Was hoping there would be something free out there for a single user.”

“Linear!”

“Have a look at Linear. Works great for me and my agents.”

“My team has moved from Jira to Shortcut to Linear and then back to Shortcut. All of these sort of tools seem to grow their feature set until it gets unwieldy and then we end us switching to something lighter to make life easier.”

“And the crazy thing is that Linear getting 25x revenue for a SAAS company today is an impressively high mark”

“- Linear for task + project management”

“He told me he was leaving Coinbase to build the ultimate developer-focused project management suite. Sounded nuts at the time. What a ride. Congrats to the @linear team!”

“Jira's shittiness is what made Linear become so popular.”

“\> Hey Claude, use the Linear MCP to create me an app that shows me a graph of all the issues in my project or workspace, connected by dependencies, similar to how they display project dependencies (https://linear.app/docs/project-dependencies)”

“Add a software factory when you need an event-driven queue of work (e.g. Slack triggers, GitHub issues, Linear, a backlog) to run in an isolated cloud environment to handle triage, implementation and testing with some explicit human babysitting."”

“I fucking love Linear. Whenever I have an idea, i tell Claude to see what we have in linear on the topic and then we expand upon it, sync it back.”