“for me, customization, in my experience cursor has strictly enforced it's coding/chat style, every time I tell it to stop doing something it says "yes, I'll stop from now on", then proceeds to do it in the next message”
“Cursor is the IDE plus a Claude seat. Claude Code is a terminal agent that can sit on a repo without the IDE. I use both when I want the agent in a pane the editor does not own.”
“In essence, what I mean is Cursor could migrate Origin out of Amazon's S3, but they'd lose a lot of reliability and/or performance in the process.[0]: https://aws.amazon.com/s3/ (Click on Durability and availability)”
“The problem is that Musk acquired Cursor and therefore Cursor has zero credibility.I don't care about what they say because of who they sold out to”
“This is a really well written article and definitely changes my perception about Cursor's capability to host a reliable Github replacement. But I could never bring myself to use it because of whose leadership they're under now.”
“I really wish someone would make a version of the opencode desktop application that's as responsive and well-made as Cursor so I can promptly move over.”
“I just switched my claude 100$ account for the cursor 60$ one and Ineven double ckecked with opus5 on which would be better, opus5 gave me a dociding question to ask grok on cursor, it amazed opus5 and it recommended me to move to cursor!”
“It can't be any worse than current github, and since we've heard plenty of people express their dissatisfaction with github recently, this is actually a good direction for Cursor.”
“I also don't use Cursor (I think most people have moved on to Claude Code/Codex), so also not helpful from that point of view. Regardless, not only do I find it morally wrong to give Musk money, I think it's a bad business idea.”
“But, setting that aside, how would creating a custom worktree skill solve my other problem -- grouping chats by worktree in the Cursor UI? And what do you mean "have it used by default on all your other skills"?”
“The thing that does not port to Cursor is composability: Claude Code is a CLI, so you can script it, pipe it, and run twenty headless in parallel as build steps, whereas inside an editor you are always somewhat inside the editor's model of a session.”
“Yes it is crazy good and crazy accurate nowadays. Normally I work with Cursor Composer Auto and the reviewer and planner is Opus but it looks like grok is finding an problem in the Opus plan.”
“I’m trying to determine if using a fable subagent for adversarial review is gonna cost me the whole window plus the fable response. Also @cursor is there any chance we could get some additional sub agent configurations?”
“Well, why use Claude code when cursor can do the same thing but also has significantly more other features? Including access to the entire vscode extension marketplace.”
“Our times at GH didn’t overlap much but hearing the fact that he’s working at cursor increases my estimation of their engineering org by leaps and bounds.”
“Cursor kept changing its ui, and I found that separating the agentic app from the editor to be cleaner for me. Functionally, you can do the same workflows either way.”